Boston vs Toronto
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toronto Raptors | — | $831.7K | No liquidity39.4% | — | — | — | — | ||
Boston Celtics Winner | — | $832.4K | No liquidity63.7% | — | — | — | — | ||
Draw No liquidity | — | — | No liquidity9.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market covers the NBA Summer League matchup between the Boston Celtics and Toronto Raptors, played on July 10, 2026 in Las Vegas. Kalshi listed both a moneyline market (did Toronto win?) and a spread market (did Toronto win by more than 12.5?), while Polymarket offered a standard winner market and Azuro provided a wide range of prop and spread lines. The event is now closed, with all markets fully resolved. Chris Cenac Jr. hit a 3-pointer as time expired in regulation to force overtime, and Boston defeated Toronto 83-80 in the NBA Summer League opener at the Pavilion in Las Vegas. Amari Williams finished with 23 points and 13 rebounds to lead the Celtics. The result explains why every Boston-wins outcome has resolved to near-certainty: Kalshi's moneyline and spread markets both sit at 99.0% for Boston, and Polymarket's winner market has settled at 100.0% for the Celtics. The one notable cross-platform discrepancy is Azuro, where the Toronto Raptors moneyline still showed 39.4% implied probability at snapshot time — a stark contrast to Polymarket's 0.1% — suggesting Azuro's prices had not yet fully adjusted to the final result. Toronto held a three-point lead in the final seconds before Cenac Jr.'s clutch corner three forced overtime, which likely kept pre-resolution prices compressed on the Toronto side. With $1.6M in total volume, Kalshi dominated liquidity at over $713K, while Polymarket and Azuro remained far smaller participants. The cross-platform takeaway is clear: Kalshi and Polymarket had fully priced in the Boston win, while Azuro's lagging update created a temporary but significant pricing gap that smart observers would have flagged immediately.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.