Bouzige vs Hulme
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moerani Bouzige | 1.0%Kalshi | $2.1M | No liquidity60.6% | — | — | — | — | ||
Matthew Hulme Winner | — | $2.4M | No liquidity46.1% | — | — | — | — |
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market covered the ITF M25 Brisbane Round of 32 tennis match between Moerani Bouzige and Matt Hulme, originally scheduled for July 14, 2026. On both Kalshi and Polymarket, the primary market resolves to the player who advances, with standard handling for retirements, walkovers, and delays. Kalshi drew the vast majority of activity, with roughly $3.97 million in volume against Polymarket's $413. By the snapshot, Matt Hulme was the overwhelming favourite to advance, priced at 99.0% on Kalshi and 99.9% on Polymarket, for a consensus around 99.0%. Bouzige was correspondingly deep in the tail. Side markets on Polymarket also implied Hulme dominance, with various Over lines on games sitting between 54.0% and 99.9%, though those thin markets carry little signal on their own. The most notable cross-platform gap sits on a Bouzige-related line, where Polymarket showed 19.0% versus Kalshi's 1.0% — an 18-point spread, likely reflecting Polymarket's very low liquidity of about $3,506 rather than genuine disagreement. Overall, both venues aligned on Hulme as a near-certain winner, with the only material divergence concentrated in Polymarket's thinly traded tails.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.