Colorado vs San Francisco
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colorado Rockies Winner | 99.0%Kalshi | $8.5M | — | — | — | — | — | ||
Luis Arraez: 2+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $4.6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Casey Schmitt: 2+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $1.5K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jake McCarthy: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Kyle Karros: 2+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $1.2K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Mickey Moniak: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $441 | — | — | No liquidity12.0% | — | — | — | — |
T.J. Rumfield: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Ezequiel Tovar: 2+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $1.1K | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Luis Arraez: 3+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $834 | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Kyle Karros: 3+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $1.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
T.J. Rumfield: 3+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $333 | — | — | No liquidity92.0% | — | — | — | — |
Luis Arraez: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $9.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jung Hoo Lee: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $8.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Ezequiel Tovar: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $3.4K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Mickey Moniak: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $8.2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Drew Gilbert: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.8K | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Cole Carrigg: 2+ | 50.0%Kalshi | $408 | — | — | No liquidity2.0% | — | — | — | — |
Willy Adames: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.9K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Jung Hoo Lee: 3+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $965 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jung Hoo Lee: 2+ | 5.0%Kalshi | $3.3K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Ezequiel Tovar: 3+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $911 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Mickey Moniak: 3+ | 28.0%Kalshi | $172 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Bryce Eldridge: 3+ | 24.0%Kalshi | $1.2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Casey Schmitt: 4+ | 23.0%Kalshi | $237 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Hunter Goodman: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $7.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Willi Castro: 3+ | 20.0%Kalshi | $513 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Tyler Freeman: 3+ | 19.0%Kalshi | $219 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Hunter Goodman: 3+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Cole Carrigg: 4+ | 16.0%Kalshi | $122 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jake McCarthy: 4+ | 12.0%Kalshi | $381 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Bryce Eldridge: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $8.2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Hunter Goodman: 1+ | 11.0%Kalshi | $23.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Casey Schmitt: 3+ | 9.0%Kalshi | $146 | — | — | No liquidity2.0% | — | — | — | — |
Drew Gilbert: 4+ | 9.0%Kalshi | $1.3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Bryce Eldridge: 5+ | 7.0%Kalshi | $830 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Kyle Karros: 5+ | 7.0%Kalshi | $261 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Willy Adames: 1+ | 6.0%Kalshi | $12.3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jake McCarthy: 5+ | 5.0%Kalshi | $148 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jung Hoo Lee: 5+ | 4.0%Kalshi | $1.2K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Tyler Freeman: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $2.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Heliot Ramos: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $816 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Tyler Freeman: 2+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $536 | — | — | No liquidity28.0% | — | — | — | — |
Willi Castro: 2+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $181 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Drew Cavanaugh: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $393 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Drew Gilbert: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $6.6K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Willi Castro: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
San Francisco Giants | 0.1%Polymarket | $9.7M | — | — | — | — | — | ||
Luis Arraez: 4+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $522 | — | — | No liquidity26.0% | — | — | — | — |
Jung Hoo Lee: 4+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $2.8K | — | — | No liquidity24.0% | — | — | — | — |
Heliot Ramos: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $14.7K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Casey Schmitt: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $29.4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jake McCarthy: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $9.7K | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Cole Carrigg: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $8.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Kyle Karros: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $15.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Bryce Eldridge: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $25.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Drew Cavanaugh: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $3.7K | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
T.J. Rumfield: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $6.8K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market covers the July 10 MLB game between the Colorado Rockies (visiting) and the San Francisco Giants (at Oracle Park), the second game of a four-game NL West series. On Polymarket, a Colorado win resolves "Colorado Rockies" and a Giants win resolves "San Francisco Giants." Kalshi runs an extensive companion suite covering the full game moneyline, first-3/5/7-inning lines, spread markets, run totals, and individual player props for Rafael Devers, Robbie Ray, Tanner Gordon, and others. The moneyline is the most-traded market, with Kalshi's Colorado vs. San Francisco contract drawing over $2.28M in volume and Polymarket adding another $729K. The consensus leans Colorado Rockies at 53.0%, with Polymarket at 52.0% and Kalshi at 53.0% — a negligible 1.0-point spread between platforms. The Giants sit at 48.0% on both Kalshi and Polymarket. That slim Colorado edge is a notable divergence from traditional sportsbook lines: line movement has gone toward San Francisco, with the Giants sitting closer to -167 at major books, and ESPN Analytics gives the Giants a 67.0% chance to win. The prediction markets' Colorado lean may reflect a sharp-money position on the underdog price. Context matters here — San Francisco is trying to build on Thursday's 8-2 series-opening win, while Colorado enters having dropped two straight. Tanner Gordon starts for Colorado with a 6.95 ERA, while San Francisco counters with Robbie Ray, who owns an 8-6 record and a 3.45 ERA. Both platforms agree within 1.0 percentage point on the moneyline, making this one of the tighter cross-platform matchups on the board despite the wider gap versus traditional oddsmakers.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.