Duerst vs Leykina
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polina Leykina Winner | 31.1%Azuro | $53.0K | — | — | — | — | — | ||
Jenny Duerst Widest spread 75.3% | 1.0%Kalshi | $33.3K | — | — | — | — | — |
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
Duerst vs Leykina was a women's professional tennis match staged as the 2026 W35 Hillcrest quarterfinal, with Kalshi's headline market resolving Yes if Jenny Duerst won after a ball was played. The event drew roughly $77.7k in total volume, almost all of it on Kalshi, with Azuro adding a thin secondary book covering handicap, game totals, and set-specific side markets. On the moneyline, the two venues told sharply different stories. Kalshi priced Polina Leykina at 99.0% to win, effectively treating the outcome as settled, while Azuro's implied price for Leykina sat at just 31.2% — a cross-platform spread of 67.85 points on the same outcome. The mirror image showed up on Duerst: Kalshi had her at 1.0% versus Azuro's 76.3%, another 75.34-point gap. Azuro's derivative markets leaned toward a Duerst-favoured, low-total match (Duerst -1.5 at 54.9%, Under 20.5 games at 57.8%), consistent with its own moneyline but not with Kalshi's. The cross-platform takeaway: Kalshi and Azuro effectively booked opposite favourites in this quarterfinal, one of the widest same-outcome disagreements observable in the snapshot.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.