IND Colts vs WAS Commanders
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indianapolis Colts Winner | 50.0%Limitless | $11.4M | No liquidity99.0% | No liquidity99.5% | No liquidity99.5% | ||||
Washington Commanders | — | $13.9M | No liquidity0.3% | ||||||
Draw | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This Week 4 international-series matchup, played in London, pits the Indianapolis Colts against the Washington Commanders, with Polymarket, Kalshi, Gemini, Limitless, Novig, Polymarket US and Azuro all listing markets on which team wins (with a small-probability draw outcome also priced in). As of the snapshot, the Colts and Commanders are essentially tied, with Indianapolis holding a slight consensus edge at 50.2% to Washington's 49.8%, making this one of the closer games on the board rather than a clear favourite situation. Pricing diverges more by platform than by team: Azuro quotes the Colts as low as 47.2% while pricing the Commanders much higher at 55.6%, and Limitless similarly shows the Commanders near 55.8%, whereas Polymarket US and Kalshi have the two sides nearly even around 49–51%. That produces a cross-platform spread of over 6 points on the Commanders side, suggesting some venues haven't fully adjusted their books. The uncertainty is understandable given the injury picture: starting quarterback Jayden Daniels will miss a second straight week with a dislocated elbow, with backup Marcus Mariota starting, and top receiver Terry McLaurin was also ruled out with a hamstring injury. Washington is notably thin on offense against Indianapolis as a result, while the Colts remain in relatively good shape on the injury front, save for two of their top wide receivers. Overall, despite Washington's significant injury-driven offensive limitations, the betting markets still treat this contest as nearly a coin flip, with only modest separation between the two teams and wider disagreement between platforms than between the outcomes themselves.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.