Jule Niemeier vs Alessandra Mazzola
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jule Niemeier Winner | — | No liquidity48.3% | — | — | — | — | No liquidity100.0% | — |
Alessandra Mazzola Eliminated | — | No liquidity57.8% | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$6.1K | — |
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
The market on Polymarket covered the ITF Aschaffenburg first-round tie between German Jule Niemeier and Italian Alessandra Mazzola, resolving to whichever player advanced. Since the event is now closed, the outcome is settled: Niemeier prices sit at 100.0% on Polymarket while Mazzola trades at 0.1%, confirming Niemeier as the winner. Azuro carried a much wider derivatives book — handicaps, game totals, odd/even and set spreads — but attracted no meaningful volume, with the main-line moneyline showing Niemeier at 48.3% and Mazzola at 56.5% before resolution, a stale quote that never converged to the Polymarket consensus. Polymarket handled essentially all liquidity here, roughly $6,355 in traded volume against $137,246 of resting liquidity, while Azuro's book stayed at zero. That gap explains the large pre-close spread on the moneyline: Polymarket's post-resolution 100.0% versus Azuro's untouched 48.3% for Niemeier is a 51.7-point gulf, but it reflects Azuro's inactivity rather than genuine disagreement about the match. Derivative lines on Azuro — Under 2.5 sets at 69.4%, Over 11.5 total games at 71.4%, Mazzola -0.5 at 56.5% — priced a competitive straight-sets Niemeier win, which is broadly consistent with the moneyline outcome. Across platforms, Polymarket delivered a clean resolution in Niemeier's favour while Azuro's richer but illiquid market added colour without price discovery.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.