Los Angeles A vs Minnesota
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota Twins Winner | 99.0%Kalshi | $3.1M | No liquidity57.8% | — | — | — | — | ||
Royce Lewis: 1+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $8.6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Jorge Soler: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $1.2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Trevor Larnach: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $2.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Tristan Gray: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $634 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Denzer Guzman: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $968 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Alan Roden: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $1.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Nolan Schanuel: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $1.5K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Wade Meckler: 1+ | 3.0%Kalshi | $715 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Royce Lewis: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $558 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Zach Neto: 2+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $1.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Nolan Schanuel: 2+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $268 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Wade Meckler: 2+ | 99.0%Kalshi | $238 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Logan O'Hoppe: 1+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $452 | — | — | No liquidity1.0% | — | — | — | — |
Vaughn Grissom: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Brooks Lee: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $5.4K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Victor Caratini: 2+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $115 | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Brooks Lee: 3+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $894 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Trevor Larnach: 3+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $129 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Zach Neto: 3+ | 2.0%Kalshi | $868 | — | — | No liquidity99.0% | — | — | — | — |
Los Angeles Angels | 0.1%Polymarket | $2.0M | No liquidity43.7% | — | — | — | — | ||
Kody Clemens: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $24.6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Josh Bell: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $12.3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Zach Neto: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $6.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Brooks Lee: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $8.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Victor Caratini: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $6.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Luke Keaschall: 1+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $5.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Trevor Larnach: 2+ | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.3K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Twins wins by over 4.5 runs | 1.0%Kalshi | $9.0K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Twins wins by over 5.5 runs | 1.0%Kalshi | $1.9K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This MLB game markets ask whether the Minnesota Twins will defeat the Los Angeles Angels in their July 11 afternoon contest at Target Field in Minneapolis. On the moneyline, a Minnesota win resolves that market to "Yes" on Kalshi and to "Minnesota Twins" on Polymarket; an Angels win resolves the opposite. Prop markets cover totals, first-inning spreads, and individual player performance for both starters and key position players. Minnesota is the clear favourite across all platforms, priced at 63.0% on Kalshi and 61.5% on Polymarket, with Azuro a touch softer at 57.8% — a modest 1.5-point cross-platform spread on the moneyline. The Angels sit at 38.0%–38.5% on Kalshi and Polymarket, with Azuro again the outlier at 43.7%. The run-line markets reinforce Minnesota's edge: Kalshi prices a Twins win by more than 1.5 runs at 45.0% and by more than 3.5 runs at 27.0%. The totals market leans heavily toward a high-scoring game, with over 3.5 combined runs priced at 93.0% on Kalshi. The pitching matchup explains much of the gap. Minnesota sends Joe Ryan (6-5, 2.85 ERA) to the mound, while Los Angeles counters with Ryan Johnson (1-4, 6.99 ERA). The underlying records add context: Los Angeles enters at 38-57, fifth in the AL West, while Minnesota stands at 46-49, third in the AL Central. The Twins have gone 7-3 over their last ten games, while the Angels have dropped eight of their last ten. Across Kalshi and Polymarket, consensus pricing on the winner market sits within a tight 1.5-point band, signalling strong inter-platform agreement on Minnesota as a comfortable but not overwhelming favourite.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.