Mecarelli vs VAN DER MEERSCHEN
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Martin VAN DER MEERSCHEN Winner | 99.0%Kalshi | $800.9K | No liquidity55.6% | — | — | — | No liquidity99.9% | — | |
Michele Mecarelli | 1.0%Kalshi | $773.0K | No liquidity50.5% | — | — | — | No liquidity0.1% | — |
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market covers the ITF M15 Segrate quarterfinal on clay between Italian teenager Michele Mecarelli and Belgian Martin Van Der Meerschen. The M15 Segrate tournament runs from July 20 to July 26, 2026. Mecarelli reached the quarterfinals after dismantling Andrea Tognolini 6–0, 6–1 in the round of sixteen, and now faces Van Der Meerschen, the seventh seed. The match resolves to the player who advances; walkovers or pre-match cancellations revert to 50-50 on Polymarket and to $0.50 refunds on Kalshi. Kalshi — where virtually all the meaningful volume sits at $1,052,363 — prices Mecarelli as the favourite at 60.0% against Van Der Meerschen at 44.0%. Azuro leans slightly the other way, giving Van Der Meerschen a narrow edge at 54.9% to Mecarelli's 51.6% in its straight-win market, while Polymarket's thin liquidity ($80) currently shows a striking 91.0% for Van Der Meerschen — a figure almost certainly distorted by the near-zero trading activity there. On the serve and return metrics that inform pre-match modelling, Mecarelli has held a slight recent edge on second-serve points won (42.89% vs 42.01%) and has been more effective returning opponents' second serves (47.70% vs 45.91%). The 16-percentage-point gap between Kalshi and Azuro on Mecarelli's win probability is the most notable cross-platform divergence, driven largely by the contrast in liquidity depth — Kalshi's deep book of nearly $390,000 in liquidity commands far more weight than the Polymarket or Azuro figures here.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.