MIA Dolphins vs MIN Vikings
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Result | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vikings Winner | Won | $5.7M | No liquidity99.0% | No liquidity50.0% | No liquidity99.5% | No liquidity99.7% | No liquidity99.8% | ||
Miami Dolphins Eliminated | Lost | $8.4M | No liquidity50.0% | Eliminated$2.2M | No liquidity0.3% | ||||
Draw | Lost | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
Miami Dolphins vs Minnesota Vikings is an NFL game scheduled for October 4 at 4:05 PM ET, with markets listed on Polymarket, Kalshi, Novig, Gemini, Limitless, Azuro and Polymarket US. Most venues price a simple winner market: Dolphins or Vikings. Kalshi, Polymarket and Limitless each state that a tie settles at 50-50. Azuro instead lists a separate Draw outcome, priced at 7.8%. Total volume stands at about $6.43 million, led by Novig ($2.50 million), Polymarket ($1.21 million) and Kalshi ($880,083). Minnesota is a clear favourite. Across the six two-way venues, the Vikings consensus is 82.5%. Midpoints range from 81.5% on Limitless and Polymarket to 82.6% on Polymarket US, a spread of just 1.1 points. Azuro is highest at 84.0%. Miami's consensus is 17.9%, ranging from 17.4% on Polymarket US to 19.1% on Azuro, a 1.7-point spread. Azuro's three-way prices, including the draw, add up to more than 100%, so they are not directly comparable with the binary venues. The roughly 65-point gap between the two teams indicates that traders broadly view Minnesota as the stronger side for this matchup. Pricing is tightly aligned across the binary platforms, and Azuro's slightly higher numbers mainly reflect its different three-way market structure rather than a meaningful disagreement.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.