New Orleans vs Cleveland
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Orleans wins by over 9.5 points | 1.0%Kalshi | $10.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
New Orleans wins by over 12.5 points | 1.0%Kalshi | $6.1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Cleveland Cavaliers Winner | — | $2.7M | No liquidity48.5% | — | — | — | — | ||
New Orleans Pelicans | — | $2.4M | No liquidity55.3% | — | — | — | — | ||
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market covered the NBA Summer League matchup between the New Orleans Pelicans and the Cleveland Cavaliers, originally scheduled for July 15, 2026 in Cleveland. The event is now closed, and it was listed across Kalshi, Polymarket, and Azuro, with a small mirror on Azuro's book as well. Kalshi ran both a moneyline market (Cleveland to win) and a spread market (Cleveland to win by more than 15.5 points), while Polymarket and Azuro offered head-to-head moneyline pricing plus, on Azuro, a broad set of spread, totals and odd/even props. By the snapshot, Kalshi's moneyline had effectively resolved in expectation, pricing Cleveland at 99.0% and New Orleans at 1.0%. Polymarket, however, showed a much tighter pre-game picture, with Cleveland at 55.0% and New Orleans at 46.0%. Azuro's moneyline inverted that read, quoting the Pelicans as favourites around 54.9%–55.3% versus the Cavaliers near 47.4%–48.5%. Cleveland is the outright favourite on Kalshi by a near-certain 98-point margin, consistent with a market that has essentially priced in the result. The notable cross-platform divergence is between Kalshi's near-certain Cleveland line and Polymarket and Azuro's still roughly coin-flip pricing on the same matchup.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.