Premium Liiga (Estonia): 2026 Winner
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCI Levadia No liquidity | — | $246 | — | — | — | — | — | No liquidity74.5% | — |
FC Flora No liquidity | — | $317 | — | — | — | — | — | No liquidity0.7% | — |
Nõmme Kalju Eliminated | — | $339 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$339 | — |
Nõmme United Eliminated | — | $146 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$146 | — |
Paide Linnameeskond No liquidity | — | $249 | — | — | — | — | — | No liquidity0.4% | — |
Tartu JK Tammeka Eliminated | — | $239 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$239 | — |
Pärnu JK Vaprus Eliminated | — | $165 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$165 | — |
Harju JK Laagri Eliminated | — | $146 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$146 | — |
FC Kuressaare Eliminated | — | $326 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$326 | — |
Narva Trans Eliminated | — | $146 | — | — | — | — | — | Eliminated$146 | — |
Description from Polymarket. A cross-platform summary is generated once this event is matched across platforms.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed club is determined as the champion of the Premium Liiga (Estonia) for the 2026 season. Otherwise, it will resolve to "No". If at any point it becomes impossible for a listed participant to be named as the champion of Premium Liiga (Estonia) for the 2026 season per the rules of Premium Liiga (Estonia) (e.g., the participant is eliminated), the corresponding market will resolve to "No". If multiple teams are declared winners, this market will resolve in favor of the team whose listed name comes first alphabetically. If this event is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or a champion has not been declared within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "Other". The resolution source will be official information from the Premium Liiga (Estonia); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.