Sobolieva vs Avdeeva
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Volume | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Julia Avdeeva | 0.1%Polymarket | $474.0K | No liquidity46.1% | — | — | — | — | ||
Anastasiia Sobolieva Winner | — | $811.3K | No liquidity60.6% | — | — | — | — |
Dimmed prices were last confirmed too long ago for the state of this event (in play, before the game, or long-dated) and are left out of consensus, best price and spread.
AI-generated summary, may be inaccurate.
This market concerns the semifinal clash between Anastasiia Sobolieva and Julia Avdeeva at the 2026 W100 Aschaffenburg, a $100,000 ITF clay-court event in Germany. The tournament ran from July 6 to July 12, 2026. A "Yes" or "Sobolieva" resolution means Sobolieva advanced; any "Avdeeva" or "No" outcome would have required her opponent to prevail. The market is now effectively settled, with the result reflected in the odds. Across platforms, Sobolieva is priced at a near-certain 99.9% on Polymarket and 99.0% on Kalshi, leaving Avdeeva at just 0.1% and 1.0% respectively. The only notable divergence is on Azuro, which shows Avdeeva at 46.1% on the moneyline — a stark contrast suggesting Azuro's market either did not update after the result or carries significantly stale liquidity. With $0 volume and $0 liquidity listed on Azuro, those figures should be treated as uninformative. The draw data confirms Sobolieva progressed through the tournament, having beaten Bennemann in the first round and then defeating top seed Lucia Bronzetti en route to the semifinal, where she faced the sixth-seeded Avdeeva. The overwhelming consensus on Polymarket and Kalshi — platforms with real volume ($18,749 and $1.25M respectively) — points clearly to a Sobolieva victory having been confirmed. Overall, Polymarket and Kalshi are tightly aligned on a Sobolieva outcome, while Azuro's outlier 46.1% Avdeeva figure reflects a liquidity-absent market that should be disregarded as a signal.
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.