Will any federal court rule issues a preliminary or permanent injunction, vacatur, or stay halting all or part of the FCC's early ABC license renewal proceedings?
Markets
Every market on this event, moneyline first. Select one to compare it across platforms in the side panel.
| Outcome | Best | Azuro | Gemini | Kalshi | Limitless | Novig | Polymarket | Polymarket US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes Favorite | 83.0%Kalshi | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
No | 59.0%Kalshi | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Description from Kalshi. A cross-platform summary is generated once this event is matched across platforms.
If any federal court issues a preliminary or permanent injunction, vacatur, or stay halting all or part of the FCC's early ABC license renewal proceedings in ABC v. FCC, No. 1:26-cv-02902 (D.D.C.), any appeal, or any federal challenge to the April 2026 early renewal order before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. The ruling must: Be issued by any federal court in ABC v. FCC, No. 1:26-cv-02902 (D.D.C.), an appeal of it, or a federal challenge to the April 2026 early renewal order Address the matter described by the specified judgment Be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment, or decision Partial relief counts. An order barring the Commission only from designating the ABC renewal applications for hearing resolves the market to YES. The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: A temporary restraining order, unless the court converts or extends it into a preliminary injunction An administrative stay entered to allow briefing An order denying a motion to dismiss, or a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction An FCC decision to withdraw, suspend or stop acting on the early renewal proceedings Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Settlements or voluntary dismissals Administrative or scheduling orders
Discussion (0)
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet — start the discussion.